The revolution that my group studied was the Decembrist Revolt. After Tsar Alexander of Russia dies, there was confusion over who should take the throne. Constantine refused the throne leaving Tsar Nicholas to step up. The people of Russia wanted constitutional change, an end to serfdom and poverty and to remove Nicholas from the throne. The people wanted Constantine to be the Tsar, Tsar Nicholas said, "I approached them, wanting to stop the men and place them in formation, but when I called out “Halt!” they replied: “We’re for Constantine!”" (Tsar Nicholas Describes the Decembrists’ Revolt on 14 December 1825) In order for Nicholas to end the revolt, he had to take drastic measures. "At that point, seeing no other alternative, I ordered “Fire!” (Tsar Nicholas Describes the Decembrists’ Revolt on 14 December 1825) Nicholas fired on his own people, shutting down the revolt Many people understood the ideas of the Decembrist Revolt. The knew that the goal was constitutional change and to end serfdom, they knew that Tsar Nicholas had to fire on his own people to end the revolt, and they knew that this revolt was a complete failure.
Another revolution, the Frankfurt Assembly, was a partial success, the nationalists and liberals got what they wanted but there was still monarchy. The Hungarian revolt of 1848 was a neutral revolution because there was little change. Lastly, the French Revolution of 1848 was somewhat of a success too because they got some of the things they wanted while they didn't get all of them. I believe that the revolts of 1830 and 1848 are not complete failures like some people believe. The majority expressed a change and the people received what they were fighting for. Therefor they are all partial successes.
No comments:
Post a Comment